Make vs N8N
Make (formerly Integromat) vs N8N comparison. Compare visual workflow builders, pricing models, self-hosting, and automation capabilities.
3
Make wins
0
Ties
2
N8N wins
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | Make | N8N |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder QualityWinner: Make | Make has the most polished visual automation builder on the market. The circular module design and connection flow is intuitive. Scenario branching and routing are easy to understand visually. | N8N's canvas-based builder is flexible and powerful. Node-based design with connections. Good visual clarity for complex workflows. More technical-feeling than Make. |
| Pricing ModelWinner: N8N | Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Free tier has 1,000 ops/month. Core is $9/month for 10,000 ops. Operations count can be unpredictable for complex scenarios. | N8N self-hosted is completely free with unlimited executions. Cloud starts at $20/month. No per-execution pricing on self-hosted. Dramatically cheaper at scale. |
| Self-Hosting OptionWinner: N8N | Make is cloud-only. No self-hosting option available. All data flows through Make's servers. Not suitable for organizations with strict data residency requirements. | N8N can be self-hosted via Docker with full data control. Run on your own infrastructure with no data leaving your environment. Critical for regulated industries. |
| Integration CountWinner: Make | Make has 1,500+ integrations with well-built modules for popular tools. Each module is carefully designed with clear input/output fields. Quality over quantity approach. | N8N has 400+ community-contributed nodes plus custom HTTP request capabilities. Growing fast but fewer polished integrations. Custom nodes fill gaps but require development. |
| Error HandlingWinner: Make | Make has excellent error handling with retry logic, error routes, break/resume functionality, and detailed error logs. Easy to build robust, fault-tolerant automations. | N8N has good error handling with retry mechanisms and error workflows. Less intuitive to set up than Make but functionally capable. Improving with each release. |
Visual Builder Quality
MakeMake
Make has the most polished visual automation builder on the market. The circular module design and connection flow is intuitive. Scenario branching and routing are easy to understand visually.
N8N
N8N's canvas-based builder is flexible and powerful. Node-based design with connections. Good visual clarity for complex workflows. More technical-feeling than Make.
Pricing Model
N8NMake
Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Free tier has 1,000 ops/month. Core is $9/month for 10,000 ops. Operations count can be unpredictable for complex scenarios.
N8N
N8N self-hosted is completely free with unlimited executions. Cloud starts at $20/month. No per-execution pricing on self-hosted. Dramatically cheaper at scale.
Self-Hosting Option
N8NMake
Make is cloud-only. No self-hosting option available. All data flows through Make's servers. Not suitable for organizations with strict data residency requirements.
N8N
N8N can be self-hosted via Docker with full data control. Run on your own infrastructure with no data leaving your environment. Critical for regulated industries.
Integration Count
MakeMake
Make has 1,500+ integrations with well-built modules for popular tools. Each module is carefully designed with clear input/output fields. Quality over quantity approach.
N8N
N8N has 400+ community-contributed nodes plus custom HTTP request capabilities. Growing fast but fewer polished integrations. Custom nodes fill gaps but require development.
Error Handling
MakeMake
Make has excellent error handling with retry logic, error routes, break/resume functionality, and detailed error logs. Easy to build robust, fault-tolerant automations.
N8N
N8N has good error handling with retry mechanisms and error workflows. Less intuitive to set up than Make but functionally capable. Improving with each release.
The Verdict
Choose Make if you want the most polished visual automation builder with excellent error handling and you do not need self-hosting. It is the best cloud-only option for non-developers. Choose N8N if you need self-hosting, want to avoid per-execution pricing, or need the flexibility of custom code nodes. For AI automation workflows, N8N's code flexibility and self-hosting make it the stronger choice.
Need Help Choosing the Right Tools?
I help companies evaluate, implement, and integrate their sales and marketing tech stack with AI automation. Book a free consultation to discuss your needs.
More Tool Comparisons
N8N vs Zapier
N8N vs Zapier detailed comparison. Compare pricing, flexibility, self-hosting options, and automation capabilities to choose the right workflow automation tool.
CRMHubSpot vs Salesforce
In-depth HubSpot vs Salesforce comparison for 2026. Compare pricing, features, ease of use, integrations, and scalability to pick the right CRM for your team.
Sales IntelligenceApollo.io vs ZoomInfo
Apollo vs ZoomInfo head-to-head comparison. Compare data quality, pricing, features, and ROI to choose the best sales intelligence platform for your outbound team.
Data EnrichmentClay vs Clearbit
Clay vs Clearbit comparison for B2B data enrichment. Compare data sources, waterfall enrichment, pricing, and use cases to pick the right enrichment tool.
Sales EngagementSalesloft vs Outreach
Salesloft vs Outreach detailed comparison. Compare features, pricing, AI capabilities, and usability to choose the right sales engagement platform.